Cute Butterfly Saying

In Reggio Zù Ntònu

Francesco Siciliano
(Lawyer at the Court of Cosenza)



At the proposal of the Director Cosenza, I would try it, by quisque de populo , to give an answer of adhesion arguing a small view of things.

Back from vacation and back down again to normal daily life with its problems and also with his charm. At the time of vacation, though, there goes astray, you think you look. In a few days I saw faces and thoughts of the conscious and the unconscious.

I saw Zù Ntònu, upright man, plowing the land, had a job went to the cellar to play cards and drink a glass of wine, he never failed to lend anything to his children and his family just as it has never denied a salute to Don Ciccio.

He always said good vespers to the gentleman who was passing. His son emigrated to Peppino, now earns a better America Jobb for him and his family, and I remember as a child, had a shower in the bathroom.

Zu Ntònu has always voted for democracy, for the Socialists, although those of socialist democracy or knew who he was Don Cicco, when it came to Don Ciccio or some big shot, he said figliu Ntònu Zu, makes you think in your life, dog eat dog.

In a moment of returning to reality, I remember I saw a politician changed my friend and Zù Ntònu, there was alluring and aloof, had the votes to be elected.

was obsessed and consumed by doubt and uncertainty: where do you a favor if it was available.

He knew that revolved around him many friends of Don Ciccio, so, without risk, the important thing was to do the favor for a friend of a friend of Don Ciccio, so he knew that the political, however, was not contrary .

I also reviewed many of my friends and Zù Ntonu, 80 years, attending estate of Don Ciccio - somehow had to spend his money - normally, without doubts and, above all, without parental prohibitions.

I remembered when had to do a building where there was the house of Zù Ntònu, upright man, went to Don Ciccio, built a beautiful palace, gave him two flats was a beautiful building, bought an apartment even the sergeant.

I have reviewed, sometimes in doubt, Zù Ntònu as if winking at Don Ciccio, or otherwise comply, I could perhaps live better.

's the drama of this land, or perhaps the nation, have no doubt that a friend of the friends I probably should have it.

At sunset behind me I Pinuccia reappeared, the nephew of Zu Ntònu, embraced the grandson of Don Ciccio, the evening came with large machinery, Pinuccia was beautiful, but none of us could afford to look at her and she, I remember, was very happy to be feared and guarded in secret.

Nobody ever said, look at what is the grandson of Don Ciccio, even Zù Ntònu, honest worker.

I could not understand why. One evening, I hugged him again Zù Ntònu I tried to tell him that the synergy between the best parts of the institutions and society, combined with the roadmap of law on the part of the policy, they could avoid a repeat of his plays, fighting for the restoration values \u200b\u200babove the law by building antibodies within the ruling class in order to prevent the infiltration of politics uomini delle cosche era assolutamente necessario; insomma gli ho sbattuto in faccia la verità, gli ho spiegato che tutto quello che ha determinato l’imbarbarimento della situazione calabrese che perpetua lo sfruttamento delle classi deboli e l’intangibilità dei poteri mafiosi rafforzata dall’umanità grigia dei sodalizi criminali da domani troverà forti contrasti e non sarà più possibile; mi ha guardato, un po’ stranito, e mi ha chiesto cosa volessi dire.

La sua vita, i suoi sogni, in realtà, si sono fermati, con le continue richieste di elargizione di lavoro per suo figlio Peppino poi con la sua partenza, da quel momento non ha più avuto proiezione è come se il tempo si fosse fermato, and as long as he greeted Don Ciccio and the Lord has become eternal, after all "The Calabrian put their patriotism in the simplest things, like the goodness of their fruits and their wines. Hopeless love of their country, of which recognize the harsh life that have escaped, but remained in their state of memory and legend of the Child ".

Zù Ntònu could never see his son walk the streets he had already crossed, he who for a job had to bow his head, he sees that since the same Nazarenes (except variations on the Name) meting out future, has become immutable, insensitive, continued to vote, when He goes, for democracy or for the Socialists and has never denied a salute to Don Ciccio, nor thought of not buying something from him.

You buy something from him, because for some 'time, Don Ciccio stopped turning in cloth cap, and in tricolor sash or 3.20, today, he sells, manufactures, find rare books, go to the theater.

At some point, I really hated, I took him by the neck and told him: zu nt, but you need to plow the land, not to leave anything to your children, if we buy everything from Don Ciccio telling you to vote for democracy and socialist and Pepper to go to America for jobb? You are the first that has come to Reggio, I recommend not to miss.

Poem Money Tree Birthday

Asked to come to trial by three judges who stopped investigations Louis De Magistris

Antonio Massari
(Journalist)




Done by The Daily of September 3, 2010


The Prosecutor of Salerno "Investigation unlawfully removed" . On
"Why not" and "Poseidon" war is with the judicial office of Catanzaro


Investigations "Why Not" and "Poseidon" were unlawfully removed from Luigi De Magistris, in 2007, when he was a token of the prosecution of Catanzaro: this is the argument of the Prosecutor of Salerno, after closing the investigation, requested the indictment of three judges Calabria, the Parliamentary Assembly of the PDL Giancarlo Pittelli, former Undersecretary for Productive Activities Pino Galati (UDC) and the strong man of Communion and Liberation in Calabria, Antonio Saladino.

The first responses to the judicial "De Magistris case" come November 3, when the investigating magistrate Vincenzo Pellegrino will decide on the requests of three pm (Rocco Alfano, Minerva and Maria Chiara Cantarella Antonio) who "inherited" the investigation by prosecutors Gabriella Nuzzi and Dionysius Verasani, then punished, with the transfer from CSM.

storage instead sought - in the morning, first published yesterday, the news - for another four judges - Enzo Iannelli, Alfredo Garbati, Domenico de Lorenzo and Salvatore Curcio - facing charges of aiding and acts of omission ' : office had refused to transmit the files of Poseidon and Why Not to Salerno pm (Nuzzi and Verasani) who were investigating the theft of files from De Magistris. A refusal that resulted, first, in the seizure of documents, work by prosecutors Salerno. It took poi, proprio a causa del sequestro, alla punizione di Nuzzi, Verasani e del loro capo Luigi Apicella.

Oltre che sulla richiesta di archiviazione, però, il gip dovrà deciderà sul rinvio a giudizio degli altri magistrati: l’ex procuratore capo Mariano Lombardi (fu lui ad avocare Poseidone a De Magistris), il procuratore generale reggente Dolcino Favi (avocò l’inchiesta Why Not) e il procuratore aggiunto Salvatore Murone.

Le indagini della procura di Salerno ipotizzano, tra vari reati, anche la corruzione in atti giudiziari.

A trarre vantaggio dalla revoca di Poseidone, secondo l’accusa, furono Pittelli e Galati che, negli atti della chiusura d’indagine, appaiono as "instigators" of "misconduct" and Murone Lombardi.

"The inevitable stagnation of the preliminary investigation in progress" , had written to the prosecution in closing the investigation, led to "encourage those involved in investigations, particularly Pittelli and Galatians, which, in a wider corruptive environment (...) had worked to receive both Lombardi, and his son Pierre Greek, money or other benefits ". Illegal

also the avocation of Why Not: de Magistris, had entered in the register of the former suspects Minister Clemente Mastella (later filed by the prosecutor of Catanzaro).

Combs moved the trial assuming the investigation to de Magistris, a "conflict of interest" as Mastella had opened an investigation on disciplinary pm. "Conflict of Interest" , according to the Prosecutor of Salerno, has never occurred, so as to argue that "was certified by a public act, a situation contrary to the true" .

For this line are investigated Combs and Saladin, at the time, was the main accused (later convicted) Why Not investigation.

"The Prosecutor of Salerno - said De Magistris, now MEP IDV - Why Not confirms that Poseidon and I were taken away illegally, due to a corrupt agreement between the heads of the offices of prosecutors and some suspects ".

"Despite being advised by the CSM time - he continues - serious about the illegal scheme and that concerned the leaders of the courts of Catanzaro, has never considered having to do so. Today Murone is the holder of the investigation into the attacks to the attorney general of Reggio Calabria. That same CSM has instead demonstrated an extraordinary zeal when, after trials disciplinary farce, carried out enforcement professional myself and my colleagues of Salerno ".

Pittelli replies "De Magistris should know, but it would be asking too much from its legal culture, that the request for indictment indictment is only a hypothesis to be verified. The most interesting part of the whole story has yet to be written. And the truth, on groups and pencils, will soon re-establish the exact contours of the most shameful imposture ever happened in the judicial-political ".

Pending the "shameful imposture" evoked by Pittelli be demonstrated, or at meno accennata, bisogna registrare questa storia annovera la punizione, da parte del Csm, di almeno quattro pm. Ai quali va aggiunta Clementina Forleo che, (anche) per aver difeso De Magistris durante Annozero, fu prima incolpata e poi trasferita (per incompatibilità ambientale) dalla Procura di Milano.

Oltre alle richieste di rinvio a giudizio (e di archiviazione), quindi, in questa vicenda pesa anche il ruolo del Csm dell’epoca, soprattutto se consideriamo che in questi giorni, altri tre pm, confermano (nelle sue parti essenziali) l’impianto accusatorio di Nuzzi e Verasani e, con esso, il “complotto” per sottrarre, in maniera illegale, le indagini all’ex pm napoletano.

Why Cant Uk People Be On Disney Channel

Thieves of hope and life

di Felice Lima
(Giudice del Tribunale di Catania)




da Il Fatto Quotidiano online dell’1 settembre 2010


Nel mio ultimo post qui ho cercato di illustrare le ragioni per le quali è un errore gravissimo ridurre il tema della legalità alla questione della impunità per il dott. Berlusconi e i suoi amici e sodali.

La legalità non è solo “dare una giusta pena” those who violate the law.

The legality - or, as in the case of our country, the lawlessness - features and function - or disqualify - the whole life of society and its hopes for the future.

Perhaps two examples may make it more convincing than what I have written in recent days.

The son of a dear friend's twenty-four. He graduated in physics, a field he loved, despite the many say that it would be easier to have an economically sustainable future work on other studies.

After graduation he did an internship in the U.S. at the end of which he wrote an article that was hosted on a magazine science.

University of Lausanne have read the article and invited him for an interview, after which they made a contract researcher and have given a whole lab of which today is responsible.

Meanwhile, he also obtained a research post at Harvard University, to which he had participated in the contest, post to which he had to give up, having already "signed" to Lausanne.

E 'common ground that this was possible because in Lausanne and Harvard have a rate of legality definitely much higher than in Italy.

In Italy, unfortunately, no university is dreams of "invite" on its own initiative a talented scholar nor give place to a young researcher is not recommended by anyone, and even stranger.

In Switzerland and the United States, by contrast, no one dreams of giving their position as a research professor of the lover rather than a scholar capable: would be immediately removed and immediately denounced and condemned.

The other story that I want to tell is that of a company that manufactures polyethylene bags (plastic grocery bags). He had evaded taxes

for a billion dollars.

tax assessments, court appeals, my decision of a court society to pay the amount evaded.

During the appeal proceedings coming one of the amnesties of Dr. Berlusconi and the company terminated its debt by paying only 20% of the amount due.

Everyone thinks that the issue here is only the theft - to the detriment of us all taxpayers - the eight hundred million remitted.

But it is not.

In the small town where the company operates now in question there are two companies that produce shopping bags.

A - honest - who has always paid taxes.

This company has built its own warehouse and bought the machinery for making a loan to the bank and pay the monthly installments of this loan.

So, when he sells his bags to make them pay a price that includes a small portion allocated to the mortgage.

The other company - dishonest - the shed and machinery if they are bought with the money he evaded taxes. With our money.

This company has no mortgages to pay and can sell his bags at a price a bit 'lower than the other.

Therefore, the dishonest company quickly put out of business the company honest.

As the company gets contracts for public works not by merit but by dirty connections - bribes, whores or otherwise - with this or that minister, Assessor, Deputy, Mayor, etc.. put in a short time off-market companies do not pay bribes and are committed to improving the quality of their product.

Ultimately, the lawlessness ravaging the structures of society.

It makes no sense to talk about university reform and procurement if not pursued with sincerity and determination of its legality.

Whatever system presupposes respect for the rules on which it relies.

The legality, efficiency of the prosecution and the courts (just the opposite of the last program year-old incumbent governments in our country) are the prerequisite of any model social.

Switzerland and the United States are countries with their faults, some of them serious. With things that work and others that do not work.

But there can hope. Why did they even scholars chosen for their quality, companies working on their own merits, politicians who were really "elected" .

What hope can have, instead, a country like ours, in which, with impunity assured to all the rich and powerful, the elite universities have unique qualities as the baronial relatives, employers are only able to take whores for third parties and politicians are moving forward with the power of blackmail by the press?

Un paese così dovrebbe desiderare la legalità più di ogni altra cosa. Un paese così dovrebbe pretendere che la legge non si tocchi e che si ricreino le condizioni perché essa sia applicata.

Un paese così dovrebbe rendere assolutamente impensabile qualsiasi ulteriore attentato a quel poco di legalità che resta.

Invece il nostro Parlamento è da anni impegnato sui temi della giustizia, ma non per ottenere ai cittadini più giustizia, ma ai delinquenti più impunità.

Tutte le leggi e i progetti di leggi portati avanti da molti anni a questa parte servivano e servono solo a proteggere chi vive di illegalità e nella illegalità.

E a neutralizzare the work of judges and justice, reduced to a pile of rubble, only to wonder when this or hypocritically murderer back free from the effects of this or that law "SalvaSilvio" or "SalvaCesare" or "SalvaMarcello ".

All peoples have their difficulties, but in Lausanne and Harvard, a young man responsible has its title and it is recognized that he was entitled.

In Italy a young man can only exercise jurisdiction to lick the c ... the politician in office and even then is unlikely to have the place, since "not entitled" , because in Italy there are no rights but only "boss promises" .

And, therefore, there is no more hope, but only illusions.

Pedicure And Itchy Legs

a short process by magic

Massimo Vaccari
(Judge of the Court of Verona)






In the last few days is come back powerfully to the fore the debate on the cd short trial, after the government announced its intention to quickly approve the draft law, which was fired by the Senate in January of this year, the Chamber.

The impact that this latest reform, if it enters into force in its current form, will have on the criminal trial were discussed by leading experts on newspapers. Less known are the negative effects it can have in civil proceedings and I therefore consider it appropriate to offer some food for thought in this regard, based on my experience as a prosecutor dedicated to the civilian sector.

First you should clarify that the bill under consideration does not alter the code of civil procedure but the law 89/2001, better known as the Pinto Act, which recognizes a compensation to those who have suffered process of no longer reasonable.

In a nutshell, the law will set the process in two short years, increasing to three, the maximum period within which this must take place each of the different degrees of civil proceedings (first instance, appeal and cassation), taking as a starting point of the first hearing and the final moment of the measure that defines the legal proceedings.

Once this deadline has passed without that there has been a decision by the judge, the process will continue normally, but its duration is no longer reasonable and that the party may seek compensation under the Pinto Act, provided that has previously submitted to the competent court instance Urges the definition of the proceedings that you regretted the slow pace.

E 'this instance that, in practice, the intentions of the legislature, should determine the acceleration of the proceedings because, if it is submitted, the court will be required to set the hearings that were required at intervals not exceeding fifteen days apart.

Now this mechanism does not take into account that the length of civil proceedings depends not only on the attitude of the parties and the court but also by a number of unpredictable variables and objectively unavoidable, as the complexity of the facts to be established, the number of shares, the procedural flaws that may occur during them. E 'for this reason that, at present, to determine if a process has had a reasonable time or not one can not ignore an examination of the case.

The new rules however do not consider the peculiarities of each process and its application will be increasingly problematic in those processes that require a larger asset evidence, it is impossible to contain pre-defined times, if not at risk of gaps and errors.

In these cases the rules approved by the Senate, if not amended, not only compress the time of trial but also the right of defense that had an interest, or necessity of a thorough and timely investigation activities reasonable, but can not oppose the request for acceleration of the process, not being provided their consent on that point.

In this perspective even the instance of acceleration can be exploited by the party, knowing that he was wrong, he did not want to fully establish the facts.

yet the bill is likely to lead to disparities in treatment are difficult to justify.

The judge, in fact, may be in the position to give priority to causes of low value, to the detriment of other, more important, economically or socially, if only in the first instance should be presented to the acceleration.

It 'easy to predict, then, that where the bodies were to be numerous, will be almost impossible to meet the deadlines set by the bill, because they will all be treated with equal speed, with the further consequence that, for all accrued the right to obtain compensation under Pinto Act.

Given these many problems really do not see what would be the benefits of the rules currently in gestation, especially if one considers that only in July 2009, entered into force a reform of the Code of Civil Procedure which, among the main purpose, to shorten the civil action (think of the possibility for the court to impose financial penalties to the party that has acted or resisted in bad faith or opinion with gross negligence, the reduction of time limits for carrying out certain procedural activities, the introduction of the summary trial).

However many commentators have agreed that even the latter will change in the law to make good the delay of civil justice that often, though not always, are objectively intolerable.

fact, to determine the current conditions of civil justice, as has been shown several times on several levels, competing on the one hand, the high rate of litigation of the Italians and, second, the chronic shortage of personnel of the registry , a distribution over the territory of the courts and, in some districts of the Court of Appeals, inadequate staffing of the judiciary than the number of population.

To affect such structural and organizational factors are needed in deep there was no indication in the draft law on the process soon.