Are You Allowed A Platypus As A Pet In Canada?

Donut & Sandwich Whole pears with apples

continue with the menu New Year. For this appetizer I was inspired by found this recipe in the blog poppy seeds, I added just a little bit.

INGREDIENTS: mixed seed bread, cheese spread, dried beef, an apple.

I prepared the bread with the bread machine, using a whole-wheat flour with various seeds. I've sliced \u200b\u200band lightly toasted slices. I put a slice on a layer of cheese splamabile, I added two slices of thinly sliced \u200b\u200bapple and then a slice of dried beef. I'm done with another slice of bread.

Fresh & Easy.

Trimethoprim Take To Be Out Of System

eg all in the name of which the People (Part Two) In the name of what

di Felice Lima
(Giudice del Tribunale di Catania)






da Il Fatto Quotidiano online del 5 febbraio 2011


In un Paese che voglia essere civile o anche solo decente chi venga sorpreso a compiere atti non commendevoli, se ne vergogna, chiede umilmente scusa e si dimette da qualunque carica e/o incarico e/o altro che possa in qualunque modo condizionare la vita politica e sociale del Paese. Dopo di che, se quei fatti costituiscono o no reato, lo accerteranno i giudici. Ma dopo che quello si è ritirato alla più nascosta vita privata.

Tanto per dire, in un Paese che voglia essere civile, un senatore (Andreotti) del quale una sentenza definitiva dica che è stato per anni complice dei mafiosi, si dimette immediatamente anche se il reato risulta prescritto.

E, se lui non si dimette, qualunque Senato che abbia il senso della propria dignità lo induce a dimettersi senza se e senza ma. Per mille ovvie ragioni, che in Italia ormai non sono più ovvie, ma che ritengo superfluo illustrare qui.

In un Paese civile il processo penale assolve il suo compito naturale, that is a task in some ways quite limited: whether the specific conduct that the person that complements or not a criminal offense and, if so, impose the penalty provided by law.

In a civilized country the process undermines the government and the process is not called upon to arbitrate in any major political issue, because in a civilized country does not allow the people that no one who maintains them for public office when he reached by suspicion of serious crimes not already qualified, but only seriously deplorable conduct.

So, in a civilized country, the process is basically just a fact about the individual person of the accused, who, if he had any public office, when ends in the courts (and in civilized countries there is no way to escape from this duty), has already left for not forcing the entire country to a Russian roulette with their most important values.

Instead, in a country where lawlessness, recklessness, lying shamelessly negative values \u200b\u200bare common, the process and the courts remain the last and the only defense of decency. This

- which in itself is a paradox and indecent - the charge process and the judges of tasks and responsibilities than what they are made of.

It 's absurd and paradoxical that a few days ago the Court of Supreme Court, dismissing the appeal of the sensor. Cuffaro, it has caused the loss of a senator. Why is it absurd that the senators have agreed to sit for years with a person of whom were known things that are known to the sensor. Cuffaro.

And mind you, this has nothing to do with the respect and human compassion that must also sen. Cuffaro. Piety and respect do not deny, but state and impose the requirement of truth and decency.

As in any civilized country, the President of the Chamber (then Casini), while a Court shall enter into closed session to condemn another senator (Dell'Utri) declares to the press and television that he telephoned the defendant to give its solidarity.

But in which country the President of the Chamber gives public solidarity with the accused Mafia rather than the courts?

In a normal country there are a thousand instruments of control of legality, propriety, decency, collective. In Italy there are only criminal trials.

This is certainly a symptom of a serious deterioration of the collective. Far.

must have been really good if our founding fathers who set up the system meant that even today, despite many years governments of all colors have been actively engaged day and night to destroy any hope of justice (this is days the news that the Ministry of (???) Justice has confirmed that the law on -called "short trial" will go on ), there is still some process going on.

But it will not last.

First, because even the judiciary is made up of Italians and, therefore, for ten Curt Bocassini there are a hundred, a hundred percent that Squillante and without yet been ascertained crimes against them, maintain pipelines such as those that led to a few months ago the deputy prosecutor of Rome (mica a Justice of the Peace in the suburbs) to resign in haste without the judiciary has said a word of courage and sincerity about the background of that story.

Secondly, because it is unthinkable justice "against the people" .

If the people find acceptable the dishonesty and lies, if he wants to power the worst people, if that is a story of child prostitution may be the subject of jokes and clichés, instead of outrage, if 315 deputies are well prepared to argue that the call to the police station to make free Ruby has been made for greater interest of the state, then you can not continue for too long to do justice "In the name of this people" .

It 's true that the "Italian people" in whose name pronounce the sentences is not the sum of the people currently on the ground patriotism, but the ' "soul" of the people described in the Constitution, but if you can accept that the people hoped the constituents is more an aspiration than a reality, you can not stand the fact that long is reduced to a naive illusion.

Meanwhile, however, the more crooks occupying all the nerve centers of the state more than break up the administration of justice and the law becomes more efficient instrument of justice from a dishonored instrument of power. The laws ad personam are not laws, are abuses against the law.

In a context so everything loses sense and the country plunges into an abyss which seems not to grasp the depth, dando luogo a uno spettacolo simile ai passeggeri del Titanic che ballavano sul ponte mentre la nave affondava.



( La prima parte )

Faking Community Service College

Blowing fusilli crust

Another recipe taken from Sale & Pepe, if a little 'revisited, to the central plate of New Year.

INGREDIENTS: a pack of puff pastry round, 160 gr. fusilli, 2 eggs, 40 gr. nuts, 50 gr. di grana o parmigiano, 6 cucchiai di olio.

Prendete le noci,  metà del grana e l'olio e create un pesto passandoli nel mixer. lessate la pasta al dente, scolatela e conditela col pesto ed i tuorli sbattuti. Al termine aggiungete li albumi montati a neve. Stendete la pasta sfoglia in una teglia, bucherellate il fondo, versateci la pasta e ricoprite il tutto con il grana grattugiato rimasto. Cuocete in forno a 200° per 10 minuti, poi per altri 20 minuti a 180°.

Il sapore era buono, però è rimasta un po' asciutta.. mentre la preparavo avrei voluto aggiungere un po' di panna, ma mi son trattenuta.. era I'd better put ..

Maplestory Where To Find Moonstone And Diamond

People (Part One)

di Felice Lima
(Giudice del Tribunale di Catania)






da Il Fatto Quotidiano online del 3 febbraio 2011


Voglio trattare, in due post successivi, dei rapporti fra il processo penale e la civiltà di un popolo.

In questi giorni, come accade always very many years when the President of the Council or any of his friends is seriously involved in deplorable facts, and their whole swarm of deputies, lawyers, journalists, intellectuals who decided to enslave themselves to power is no ifs, ands or buts rush to repeat that this or that conduct of this or that master of the country "is not subject to criminal" . Is not a crime, in fact. This

propaganda - like all the shameless propaganda from Stalin to Goebels - it is regrettable for two sets of considerations.

Under a first aspect, it is because it does violence to the truth.

E ciò perché in molti dei casi in questione i fatti SONO penalmente rilevanti (per lo meno fino a quando una legge ad personam non li depenalizza).

Sotto un secondo profilo, lo è perché diffonde l’idea che il criterio di riferimento della accettabilità o no di una condotta debba essere il codice penale. Cosa paradossale, peraltro, se detta da chi sembra non avere del codice penale alcun rispetto e da chi ha via via modificato il codice penale per adattarlo alle sue personali esigenze (nei giorni scorsi dei deputati hanno parlato di una proposta di legge per abbassare il limite della maggiore età a sedici anni: se il Presidente del Consiglio la settimana prossima deciderà di farsi bello con a girl of nine years, inviting her to dinner at his house and hold for the night, we will have children in elementary school age).

But it should be obvious to all that the criminal code is a sort of absolute minimum ethical standards of conduct and not an acceptable and sufficient to create a decent society.

A people who lived within the limits of the criminal code (and we live well below that limit), a people who considered socially, morally and politically acceptable to all that crime is not a nation of brutes voted to self-destruction. And one thing we Italians are really very, very close.

As an example among thousands of possible, entrust your child to eight years to a teacher who takes cocaine, but only for personal use (ie, without committing crimes), prostitute (prostitution itself is not a crime), who commits repeated abuse of office, but not for capital purposes (a few years ago, our Members of all political colors, agreed decriminalized abuse of office for non-capital), which you buy houses unmilione of € without his knowledge, which is usually absent from workplace, making statements to the press violently offensive police and other institutions, having sex with minors and is justified by saying that he did not know who they were?

not rely on her your child, because to be a good teacher or even a decent teacher is not enough not to commit crimes.

And that goes for everything. To be a decent husband, a decent judge, a decent lawyer, a decent player, a decent President of the Council, anything decent is not enough not to commit crimes.

When people reach a point where holders of public office can maintain important pipelines absolutely disgraceful, not only without shame, but even defending them, and bragging, arguing that such do not constitute the offense, while taking advantage of their power to change the law to decriminalize their criminal conduct, that nation is lost.
It is also low
propaganda to the constant reference to the presumption of innocence.

The presumption of innocence means that no one may suffer the consequences of a conviction as long as it is not contained in a final ruling, but in some respects does not mean that someone can continue to maintain offices and positions of which is not worthy and for which there is adequate until it reaches a final ruling.

Going back to the first, imagine a teacher who kills his daughter by cutting her throat and, surprise with a knife on hand, defends himself saying that he acted "without realizing" , "without his knowledge " .

The presumption of innocence will ensure that the teacher not to declare guilty until a final ruling.

But the question is pending for three levels of courts, to which the teacher sacred right, we will continue to entrust our children? Or, as she is entitled to their levels of courts, we have a right to uncensored teacher not only formally but also actually decent and adequate?

____


PS - Some readers have commented on my previous writing on "The inevitable punishment of history " considering my approach to things "pessimistic." In a written next try to convince you that it is not.



( The second part )